Newcastle striker search transfer update

Newcastle United could make a surprise signing at striker this summer, claims reliable journalist Mark Douglas.

The Lowdown: Magpies’ striker pursuit

The Toon have been linked with a myriad of strikers this window with Eddie Howe looking to strengthen his side’s depth in the final third.

Newcastle were of course eyeing a move for Reims striker Hugo Ekitike, with a £33m agreement even in place at one stage. However, after protracted negotiations, the North-East outfit pulled out of the deal, with the player ending up on a season-long loan at Paris Saint-Germain.

More recently, the Magpies have been rumoured to be interested in signing the likes of Alexander Isak from Real Sociedad, Ivan Toney from Brentford and Dominic Calvert-Lewin from Everton.

However, huge transfer fees being quoted have sent Newcastle looking elsewhere, with the club desperate to add alternatives to Callum Wilson and Chris Wood up top.

The Latest: Douglas’ claim

After Douglas revealed that recent target Benjamin Sesko looks likely to remain at RB Salzburg, he then went on to drop an interesting claim about the Magpies’ striker pursuit.

Taking to Twitter, the journalist said: “Of course you never know with these things and anything can happen. (Sesko) Fits the sort of profile #nufc seemed to be looking at with Ekitike. Maybe one to watch?

“Suspect next #nufc target might come in off-the-radar…”

The Verdict: Absolutely necessary

Despite Wilson’s fantastic goalscoring record in a black and white shirt, having netted 20 goals in 46 games, the 30-year-old’s injury record raises doubts over his availability ahead of next season.

During the 2021/22 campaign, the forward missed 23 games due to injury, adding to his already extensive record on the sidelines during his time at Bournemouth.

Furthermore, with Wood only having scored two goals in 16 games for the club, Howe will be desperate to bring in a reliable and consistent striker as the Magpies look to challenge for mid-table and maybe even European places next season.

Lewis-Potter could be Wolves’ Jarrod Bowen

Wolves are one of several Premier League clubs said to be interested in signing Hull City attacker Keane Lewis-Potter; and if he makes the move to Molineux, he could be Bruno Lage’s own version of Jarrod Bowen.

According to 90min, the England under-21 international is attracting interest from Brentford, Brighton, Bournemouth, Southampton, West Ham and Wolves this summer after his impressive campaign with the Tigers in the Championship. The Bees are understood to have already lodged a £20m bid.

After helping Hull to the League One title in the 2020/21 season, Lewis-Potter was instrumental once again as Shota Arveladze’s side comfortably retained their Championship status last term. The winger contributed an impressive 12 goals and three assists in 46 appearances, averaging a solid 6.82 rating from WhoScored for his performances.

Unsurprisingly, Lewis-Potter has drawn plenty of comparisons with former Hull winger Bowen, who has gone from strength to strength since signing for West Ham in January 2020, recently earning a call-up to Gareth Southgate’s England squad after a superb campaign.

Reports have suggested that, if the 25-year-old were to leave West Ham, David Moyes’ side could demand as much as £75m, which would represent a huge profit on the £20m that they paid to sign him from the Tigers two-and-a-half years ago.

Former Hull manager Grant McCann was full of praise for the 21-year-old in 2020, saying: “The kid’s a special talent. Wherever we play him across that frontline, he’ll create and score goals. He can be anything he wants to be.

“He’s quick, he’s getting stronger. If you see him physically now compared to where he was this time last year, he’s head and shoulders above in terms of his physique. He’s got all the tools to be anything he wants.”

Given that Wolves often struggled to score goals last season, netting just 38 in as many Premier League matches, attacking reinforcements should be a priority for Lage this summer.

If Lewis-Potter can fulfil his potential at Molineux and follow a similar trajectory to Bowen, then he would surely prove to be an excellent signing for the Old Gold, so they should definitely look at bringing him in – particularly given Brentford’s reported bid.

In other news… “Done deal”: Fabrizio Romano drops big transfer update, Wolves supporters surely livid

Manchester City: Romeo Lavia could leave this summer

According to The Athletic’s Sam Lee, with the potential arrival of Kalvin Phillips, Premier League interest in Manchester City gem Romeo Lavia could see to the youngster depart this summer.

The Lowdown: City’s interest in Phillips

The Athletic have reported that Man City are soon expected to make Leeds an offer for Phillips, with the champions visualising an agreement in the region of £45m – £50m.

This follows the departure of Citizens legend Fernandinho, who will leave the Etihad at the end of the month upon the expiry of his contract, after spending nine years as a Blue.

As such, the 26-year-old Leeds man has been identified as Pep Guardiola’s preferred replacement.

The Latest: Lavia out?

According to Lee, Southampton and Leeds are interested in signing Lavia this summer.

He claims that despite how highly rated the 18-year-old is, a move away from City could happen during the current window – especially if it helps with Guardiola’s push to sign Phillips.

Taking to Twitter, Lee reported:

“Leeds and Southampton are interested in Romeo Lavia this summer and – despite how highly rated he is – a move could happen, especially if it helps with signing Kalvin Phillips.”

The Verdict: Huge potential…

As per The Athletic, Lavia is very well regarded at City, and some at the club believe that he will one day be at the level required to become a mainstay in the first team.

At just 18-years-old, the holding midfielder made his senior debut for Guardiola’s side in last season’s Carabao Cup against Wycombe Wanderers, before also featuring in the FA Cup.

Having been tipped as one of the academy’s brightest prospects, Lavia’s departure will be a big loss to City, given his huge potential, and they will surely be looking to insert some form of buy-back clause or first option on any future movement.

In other news: Raheem Sterling could be tempted by ‘fresh challenge’

Rangers handed Xavi Simons boost

An update has emerged on Rangers and their chances of bringing a new midfield talent to Ibrox in the upcoming summer transfer window…

What’s the talk?

According to a Spanish outlet, via the Daily Record, Xavi Simons is yet to agree on a new contract with PSG as he wants assurances over his game time heading into the 2022/23 campaign.

The Gers and Barcelona have both been linked with a move for the midfielder this year and will now be on alert as he looks to potentially leave the Ligue 1 team on a free transfer, with this news coming as a boost to both teams.

Ianis Hagi 2.0

By snapping Simons up, Gio van Bronckhorst can find the club’s new Hagi as the PSG man is another talented, young, European, attacking midfielder.

The Romania international joined the Light Blues from Genk as a youngster and has provided 15 goals and 21 assists in 85 games for the Gers to date. He has shown that he can make things happen at the top end of the pitch as he has developed since making the move to Scotland.

In Simons, Rangers can find another up-and-coming magician with the ability to make a big impact in the final third.

Fabrizio Romano once described the 19-year-old as “more than a talent” and his form for PSG’s youth teams illustrate why he is so highly rated.

In 13 outings for the academy, the Dutchman produced six goals and six assists – with four goals and six assists in just seven UEFA Youth League games. This shows that – like Hagi – he has the ability to both score and create goals from midfield.

He was rewarded for this form by being handed opportunities in the first team by Mauricio Pochettino. The gem ended the 2021/22 campaign with six Ligue 1 appearances, playing alongside the likes of Lionel Messi, Kylian Mbappe and Neymar for the French giants, and has now played 11 senior matches for the club.

At the age of 19, this experience can be crucial for his development as he knows now what it takes to play at the very top level and has been able to watch the aforementioned players train, potentially learning from them.

Van Bronckhorst and Ross Wilson will now be hoping that the player decides to part ways with PSG – opening the door for him to come and be the new Hagi for the Gers at Ibrox.

AND in other news, GvB can find dream Bassey heir by unleashing 20 y/o Rangers gem who has a “big future”…

West Brom linked with Amer Gojak transfer

West Bromwich Albion are reportedly interested in signing Dinamo Zagreb midfielder Amer Gojak this summer.

What’s the news?

According to a recent report from Germanijak and relayed on Twitter by journalist Izak Ante Sucic, the midfielder could be on his way out of the Croatian club in the coming weeks.

It has also been claimed that Dinamo Zagreb would look for a fee of €2m (£1.7m) to sell him, with West Brom being one of many clubs looking at the player.

The 25-year-old joined the Croatian champions in February 2015 from Bosnian club FK Olimpik.

Since then, the midfielder has gone on to make 200 appearances for his current side across all competitions. In that time, Gojak has scored 18 goals and delivered 21 assists along the way.

However, this season has shown why it would be a mistake for the Baggies to launch a move for the player.

Bruce must avoid Gojak calamity

In 39 appearances this term, Gojak – who is currently valued at £2.25m by Transfermarkt – could only score on two occasions and provided just one assist.

His eight performances in Dinamo Zagreb’s Europa League campaign ultimately earned the midfielder a rather uninspiring overall rating of 6.31/10, making him one of the lowest-rated players from his side to start more than one game in the tournament according to WhoScored.

Last season was rather dismal for the Bosnian too as he spent the campaign on loan with Torino. Having made just 15 appearances in Serie A, he again earned a rather poor overall performance rating of 6.33/10 from WhoScored.

Taking all this into account, Gojak’s recent history doesn’t suggest that he would be a good signing for West Brom, or that he would do much to help them reach promotion back to the Premier League. In fact, it could be calamitous for Bruce and his side if they do end up bringing him to The Hawthorns.

It also makes it easy to see why Dinamo Zagreb are reportedly looking to get rid of the player this summer.

Also, the Midlands club’s recent signing of John Swift from Reading suggests that adding another midfielder to their ranks may not be at the top of their priorities at the moment.

In other news: Bruce can secure the next Gallagher as WBA eye £3m dynamo who is a “constant threat”

Tests or T20s, Alzarri Joseph strides the big stage

A quiet bowler who derives thrill from raw pace and Test cricket, Joseph has been making all the right moves since 2016

Vishal Dikshit in Mumbai09-Apr-20192:25

Who is Alzarri Joseph?

When Alzarri Joseph dismissed David Warner with his first ball on IPL debut to start his record-breaking 6 for 12 against Sunrisers Hyderabad, many would have assumed that to be his most memorable wicket so far. Perhaps, they weren’t aware of his first Test wicket.At St Lucia in 2016, in his third over on Test debut, he got one to rear up on the batsman at 141kph. It was fended awkwardly to the slips. The batsman was Virat Kohli.So Warner or Kohli? As a 22-year-old, growing up watching a lot of T20 cricket, maybe Warner? Maybe not. “I am not trying to look at T20 cricket at the moment,” Joseph had said in 2016 while playing the Under-19 World Cup in Bangladesh. “I am looking at Test cricket. I like it.”That’s one of the things that sets Joseph apart. Unlike many others in their early twenties who first play in the T20 leagues and then move on to the international stage, Joseph played his first-ever T20 match barely a month before his Test debut. In fact, IPL 2019 is only his third T20 tournament, after featuring twice in the Caribbean Premier League (2016 and 2018).But who is this Alzarri Joseph, who keeps taking these big wickets on the big stage?At six feet and four inches, Joseph has the height for a fast bowler. He comes from All Saints in Antigua, and grew up idolising local heroes Andy Roberts and Curtly Ambrose.

“I’ve watched most of the games and you have the fast bowler’s streak; you don’t smile much … and I like that about you.”AMBROSE TO JOSEPH

Joseph was first seen on TV at that Under-19 World Cup three years ago, when he was beating England batsmen with pace and swing. His fastest ball in the tournament was clocked at 147kph. He was extracting good bounce from back of a length in Asian conditions, and he was almost always picking early wickets, just like he did against Sunrisers.He ended the victorious World Cup campaign with 13 wickets from six matches, at an astonishing average of 13.76 and economy rate of 3.31. Joseph was already being touted as the next Kagiso Rabada then for his ability to mix the short balls and yorkers well.He set things up for West Indies in the tournament final by removing India’s top order single-handedly and ensuring a small chase. One of those wickets was of India Under-19 captain Ishan Kishan, who was trapped lbw with Joseph’s early movement. Kishan and Joseph now share the Mumbai Indians dressing room.”Now, he has an even better rhythm,” Kishan said of Joseph on Tuesday. “He is looking even better, he has improved his line and length and reads the batsmen much better. His ball skids and because of his height, he gets a lot of bounce which makes it difficult for the batsmen.”After that final in February 2016, Ian Bishop, one of the commentators of the tournament, had said Joseph was “ready” for international cricket. Just five months later, Joseph made his Test debut.AFPUp until the Under-19 World Cup, Joseph hadn’t met his hero Ambrose, but when he flew back home from Bangladesh with the trophy, Ambrose was part of the welcoming party at the airport. What was Ambrose’s advice to Joseph?”I am Antiguan, you’re Antiguan and I am proud. Anytime you need any advice or any help and as long as I am on the island, you can call on me anytime.”I’ve watched most of the games and you have the fast bowler’s streak; you don’t smile much … and I like that about you. You are very aggressive but I just want to say that it’s now the work will start.”Now that you are in the eyes of the world everyone will be watching you so I want to say to you just keep working hard, maintain your fitness, continue to develop your skills.”In a few months, Joseph would go on to work with his role model – Ambrose was bowling consultant of West Indies when he made his Test debut. The prized cap was handed by another West Indies legend Joel Garner at St Kitts, the country that was also home of his CPL franchise.As a kid, Joseph grew up bowling to his father, who played a bit of cricket for the Empire Cricket Club in All Saints, in their backyard. From there, he was coached by former West Indies quick Winston Benjamin in Antigua.Joseph grew up idolising Dale Steyn, hence honing his skill of swinging the ball away from right-hand batsmen. Putting his pace and swing to good use with his control, Joseph has gone on to become a vital cog in the West Indies ODI pace attack too.Just before his international debut, Joseph bowled to the touring Australians in the nets in St Kitts and then stand-in coach Justin Langer was impressed. “He bowled fast, beautiful yorkers – and what an athlete,” Langer said in June 2016.Just before the Test series in England in 2017, Andy Roberts was asked about West Indies’ pace attack and he said: “He’s (Joseph) young, I think he’s probably the fittest of the lot in terms of not breaking down and he also swings the ball a bit which is not common.”Jason Holder, Kemar Roach and Shannon Gabriel are more seamers. They seem to hit the deck a lot harder and try to get legcutters and offcutters whereas Alzarri Joseph, especially early in the innings, will try to swing the ball.”At the end of 2017, Joseph suffered a stress fracture in the back that kept him away from international cricket for nearly 10 months. After slowly being drafted back into the ODI side, Joseph missed the Test tour of India late last year because of recovery, but was soon playing Tests again, against England earlier this year, although not in ideal conditions.Joseph was playing his first Test in front of his home crowd when he lost his mother because of brain tumour before the start of the third day’s play. Joseph stayed strong mentally, his team-mates showed solidarity, and he continued to play. He bowled a seven-over spell that morning and got the big wicket of England’s captain Joe Root for the second time in the game.Joseph showed then that even during the darkest of days off the field, he was not going to lose his on-field habit. Of taking the biggest wickets of the opposition, a habit he continues.

My time in the Hong Kong dugout

Our correspondent gets a different perspective on an Associates game

Jarrod Kimber02-Mar-2017Under a tent too low for former seam bowlers from England, Simon Cook, formerly of Middlesex and Kent, tries to find me a chair. He looks every bit the former athlete; you can see how he took 342 first-class wickets. When he finds me a chair and puts it next to him, I may not literally be his right-hand man, but for this one-dayer (a List A game, not an official ODI) between Hong Kong and Netherlands, I’m sitting to the right of Hong Kong’s coach.That will be my place for the next two games. For the first half of the match, I’m afraid of moving in case I break some sort of PMOA (players media officials access) code, so I don’t even go to the toilet. And also because the Netherlands manager has made it clear he is not happy I am here.Cook sits at a trestle table. He has a laptop open and a notebook. Behind his laptop is a big screen, and next to that screen is the analyst Chris “Wilson” Pickett’s laptop, which is running the Sports Mechanics analyst software. Pickett looks like the kind of wiry opening bat who would annoy you by playing and missing a lot. He previously worked with Sussex, and coaches Hong Kong Dragons, the Hong Kong Chinese team.Hong Kong are fielding. Cook doesn’t give a big speech just before play; they just get out there and do their jobs. Opening bowler Ehsan Nawaz starts the day with five wides. There will be another wide and a misfield in the first over.But there is a bigger problem.Hong Kong Cricket are pioneers in many ways. They live-stream their games, and not just with a single-camera set-up and the sound of the ground, but with multiple cameras and commentators. The camera crew and producers are experts in their field but not experts in cricket. As the bowler hits the crease, they cut to a sideways view of the game. At other times they focus not on the ball but on close-ups of the stumps. And they regularly put up replays of certain balls ahead of live cricket.This drives Pickett crazy, as it’s his job to enter all the data in. At times he has to run between overs and try to train the crews on how to cover the game. For the second game he puts up his own camera and uses that. Associate teams realise that embracing data, as many of the big teams have done, will give them certain advantages. At this level, you can only afford so many mistakes.Once they start getting their data, they see something straight away that bothers them. Nawaz is over-correcting. He bowls big inswingers to left-handers, but when he bowls straight, they swing down the leg side, and when he bowls wide, they don’t swing and are often called wides. Hong Kong have been working on this for a while now.Jamie Atkinson, one of their star batsmen, is at slip. Atkinson was Hong Kong captain and big things were expected of him, but he had to give up the captaincy when he got a job as a teacher. The batsman takes a big swipe at the ball and there is a flashing edge straight to Atkinson. He never sees it. It smashes him on the head. He plays out the game but has no real impact on it. When he continues to feel unwell, he is taken to a doctor and diagnosed with concussion. He doesn’t play in the follow-up game.Pickett and Cook look at the early groupings from their seamers. They are bowling full and wide when the plan was to bowl shorter and very straight, almost on the leg-and-middle line. From their data and planning, they have seen that both batsmen like the front foot, so banging it into the deck also gives their bowlers more room for error. Cook asks 16-year-old Jhatavedh Subramanyan, the 13th man, to pass the message on to Aizaz Khan, the other opening bowler. Hong Kong today have four teenagers in the XI, the youngest being 17. In the next game they have five.

Hayat is calm, Rath is eager. Rath tries to push the game forward, Hayat tries to slow it down. They both handle pace and spin. They both look like natural batsmen and as if they intimately understand how to construct a one-day chase

Subramanyan runs off to fine leg with the message. Aizaz starts his next over with a half-volley, which is driven for four. A couple of balls later another full ball is driven away. Cook looks on silently. Then he turns to me and wonders what happened. Perhaps the message wasn’t passed on correctly or forcefully enough. Maybe the bowler decided the advice was wrong and his plan was better. Or it could just be that the bowler doesn’t have control of his length enough to execute the right ball. Later Cook asks me what I think of Bob Woolmer’s plan to have an earpiece to talk to the captain. He probably wishes he had them for all his players.Offspinner Ehsan Khan takes the wicket of Ben Cooper, and Cook passes on a new note: just bowl for dots. The thinking is that this isn’t a wicket where you can attack, so the best way is to make the batsmen play shots they shouldn’t be playing. Instead, Netherlands start hitting sixes.Cook reluctantly leaves the tent for a commentary stint, which has been cleared by the match referee. It’s the sort of thing that leading international coaches don’t often do.In the 27th over, Hong Kong’s batting prodigy, 19-year-old Anshy Rath, comes on to bowl. They worry that Rath, a decent left-arm fingerspinner when in form, might have the yips. He clearly does, and is taken for 16 runs. In the next match, he’s brought on in the 42nd over and goes for 15 runs. Between the games Cook had Rath bowling with his eyes closed, and he bowled perfectly, the problem was, he wasn’t going to be able to do that in the match.Hong Kong’s captain, Babar Hayat, is an intriguing tactician. “Babar has plans that no one on this earth can understand,” Pickett will say of him at one stage.After Rath’s over they get a bonus wicket as Ehsan, the spinner and slogger, takes a good catch on the boundary, right in front of the HK tent, and then turns and screams at the team. Someone jokes that he might have been upset with some comments about his fielding. But it turns out that in taking the catch, he has he managed to split the webbing in his fingers. Subramanyan asks if he will go back out there, “Of course,” he says, “this happens all the time.” Sarah Whitehead, the physio, carefully tries to patch up the problem and quickly gets him back on the field. Ehsan’s hands are more tape than fingers. Two overs later he is back off, as his hand is bleeding, and Whitehead goes through the motions again.Hong Kong continually set fields for Netherlands captain Peter Borren, keeping mid-on and mid-off up. They also put a specialist fielder for the reverse sweep. None of these things bothers Borren. He still plays the reverse sweep. “Reverse sweep is an ego shot,” Cook says. Later Borren slaps a straight six.Cook believes in the roles triangle, which is asking a player to accept his role within the team, train in the skills needed for that role, and then execute it on match days. This isn’t easy to explain to players who are the stars of their clubs and don’t understand that at this level they might just be role players.There are also problems specific to Hong Kong Cricket. Like, for the longest time, they essentially only had eight players they could confidently pick. They picked the three best fielders from the rest. That was because there isn’t much cricket played in Hong Kong. Sometimes players can go three weeks without a game because there simply aren’t enough grounds in the country – eight in total if you include all the AstroTurf grounds and the school grounds on which they roll out a temporary wicket.There are also culturally specific problems. One young player was offered the chance to play in an emerging-teams tournament against Sri Lanka and India, but he turned it down because it would interfere with his schooling. Another player, Shahid Wasif, is a student who also works as a security guard from 7pm to 7am.Babar Hayat is run out for 86 in the second one-dayer•Panda ManNetherlands end with 330 runs. As they eat their lunch, Cook and Pickett discuss the fact that Hong Kong bowled 50% dot balls but also let through a boundary an over. They believe their bowlers think ball by ball, like amateurs, rather than about stringing together good overs and spells.Cook takes out a whiteboard and writes where he wants the team to be at 15 overs (95 for 2), and where he wants them at 35 (222 for 4).Borren bowls the third over after his opener, Vivian Kingma, bowls a shocker, and Cook wistfully says how great it would be to have someone with that sort of experience in his side, who can also do whatever is needed at any timeThe other opening bowler, Paul van Meekeren, is bowling fast, and some of his balls are tagging sideways. Pickett talks about how they have data on van Meeekeren, and how with the Sports Mechanics app, the players can watch any bowler any time they want to learn more about them.The chat moves to stealing runs, and running in general. The team has just had a revolution in the way they think about running between the wickets, and while they have seen more runs, they have also seen more run-outs. Cook just wants them to think there is a run every ball, to have that intent.As he talks about this, 19-year-old opener Chris Carter is out there batting. Carter is clearly a talented player, but he is also new to being a specialist batsman. His technique is strong, his eye is decent, but he gets trapped in his innings (he makes 24 from 64 in the next game) and can’t find singles. His batting is fine; his run-making needs work.And it’s not just him. Both teams have players who hit boundaries but who don’t rotate the strike enough. Cook wants all his players to know that a defensive shot doesn’t just need to go straight back to the bowler. That you can drop your hands, turn your wrists, or even move across the crease before the ball is bowled to change the angle. As he talks about it, Carter is out lbw after not picking the left-arm wristspinner.The concussed Atkinson follows soon after, and at 51 for 2, there is a bit of worry in the team. With Hayat and Rath at the crease, Cook turns his attention to the next batsman, Nizakat Khan. He tells him they don’t need to over-attack, they have time to knock it around and just go at 5.5 an over for the next 20 overs. But if the ball is there to be hit, hit it. You get the feeling that Cook always is a bit cautious with his middle order, because although they don’t need much prompting to go full nuclear.

Cook takes a big breath and gets up. After the handshakes he takes his team out to the middle. He speaks softly, like a disappointed teacher. He wants them to know that they played outstandingly well, but from 250 for 2, they threw it away

Carter comes over to Cook’s computer and looks at his lbw a few times, as much as anything to see if it is out, and then to confirm what he thought: he chose the wrong ball to reverse-sweep and didn’t pick which way it was spinning. He then looks at a couple of his boundaries. What he doesn’t look at is the many balls he didn’t score off. For Carter, the boundaries aren’t the problem – he will hopefully learn to read wrist spin better. The most simple way he can improve is by facing fewer dots.There is a huge shout behind for Rath’s wicket, but the umpire is unmoved. A message from the middle at drinks confirms that he had smashed it. Hayat gets dropped, and that noticeably relaxes the team.Rath and Hayat also batted together for a very long time in the first-class match before the two one-dayers. Hayat made 173 and 31, Rath 98 not out and 88.The two of them are so different. Rath looks well coached, thinks cleverly about the game, and you can feel him itching to score. When he goes over mid-off, it is as cricket is intended. He has great feet and hands. A middle-order player at his best, thrust into the top of the Hong Kong order, in the last few months he has finally made the most of his obvious batting talent. Very soon he will sign with a county.Hayat plays languid strokes and hits the ball smoothly. There have been worries about his fitness. Often he plays one big innings and then struggles. But here he is, batting beautifully, even if his running between the wickets is at times non-existent (he is run out at a crucial moment in the second one-dayer, because he was ball-watching).Their partnership is well constructed. Hayat is calm, Rath is eager. Rath tries to push the game forward, Hayat tries to slow it down. They both handle pace and spin. They both look like natural batsmen and as if they intimately understand how to construct a one-day chase. At the end of the series Borren says the Hong Kong top order is very good, and he should know just from bowling at Rath and Hayat practically all tour.When a six is hit into the local apartments, the Hong Kong players cheer, but the coaching staff know that when a ball is hit there, it costs US$100, as you can’t go into the private residence to get it back.Even with the sixes, Hayat’s majestic calm and Rath’s professional scoring, the next man in, Nizakat, is very nervous. He sits behind Cook and Pickett, and Cook’s calming chats do not do the trick. You can feel his nervous energy, or hear his spikes rattling on the concrete nervously. He asks Pickett how many overs are left for each bowler. Later he asks again. And then one more time. “Just don’t worry about it, go out there and bat,” Pickett finally tells him. It’s quite a thing for the analyst to say, but it’s probably what Nizakat now needs to do.Ehsan Khan appeals for a wicket in the drawn first-class game•Panda ManRath brings up his hundred, and Hayat keeps going as well. They need 82 off the final ten overs with eight wickets remaining. It is not going to be easy, but they could not be in a much better position chasing 331.Then Hayat is out stumped to Borren, and despite Hong Kong being ahead in the game, I sense Cook get nervous. He picks up a plastic spoon from the ground and starts playing with it. I start to see a pattern when Cook is nervous: he will get silent, fixate on something small, and then jump up suddenly to impart some guidance for the next player.Nizakat, after all his nervousness off the field, looks quite comfortable on it. He smashes Borren for a six and then flat-bats a van Meekeren short ball back into the apartment complex. Nizakat is an extraordinary talent. He goes from looking like he is about to miss the ball by a foot to creaming it over extra cover for six. He smashed a hundred against the Sydney Thunder bowlers in a practice match before the Big Bash this season, bringing up the milestone in the last over with a six. In the second game against Netherlands, he runs down the wicket at Roelof van der Merwe and plays a squash shot over cover for six.With Nizakat and Rath at the crease, the target comes down to 46 from 36 balls. But at no stage does Cook feel overly confident.Rath then tries to put away a poor ball from Michael Rippon, but hits it very high and is caught for 134. Rath is fuming as he comes off the ground. His 130 is brilliant, but as he reaches the change room, he screams the sort of word that ESPNcricinfo doesn’t publish. Cook leans into me and says, “It’s great to see someone that that kind of anger after they’ve made a hundred”.Nizakat hits the next ball straight to long-on. “That is brainless,” Cook says to no one in particular. He writes an angry note in his book before placing it aggressively back on his desk. The whole camp feels edgier now. If Cook was the first to feel really nervous, they’ve now all joined him.It’s 30 off 24 balls with five wickets in hand and no set batsman at the crease. The two batsmen in the middle are so nervous, at one stage one goes down the wrong end to bat at the end of the over. Cook laughs a gallows laugh.He has already spoken to both batsmen out in the middle, and now he goes to the remaining batsmen and talks them through what they need to do. He could not be more calm or clear: We should play van der Merwe out. Van Meekeren will bowl short, use his pace to hit him behind the wicket. And most importantly wait for boundary balls. Netherlands are under just as much pressure as we are.Then Ehsan, who had been slogging luckily, is given out lbw. All the Hong Kong players believe it is off the glove and they crowd around the replay, which shows pretty much that. It is an exceptionally poor decision at a very crucial moment. No one mentions that Rath edged a catch early in his innings and wasn’t given out.Now no players are sitting down, it is too tense, they pace as individuals, but it’s a group worry. Cook doesn’t send messages out to the middle at the end of each over, he doesn’t panic, and he doesn’t do much, he just tries to make sure every batsman is prepared and plays sensible cricket.A full ball is scooped into the leg side. Netherlands scream “Catch”, a lone Hong Kong voice screams “No.” And then the catch is taken. Someone says that the tail always do this, someone else says, “That’s why we shouldn’t let them in.” Another wicket falls, and the talk stops altogether. Cook just refolds his arms.

When a six is hit into the local apartments, the Hong Kong players cheer, but the coaching staff knows that when a ball is hit there, it costs US$100, as you can’t go into the private residence to get it back

They have consistently lost wickets to shots that were not on. When the ninth wicket falls, Hong Kong need 16 off ten balls. Carter walks up to where his gloves have been drying in the sun and picks them up. If ever there was a sign that the No. 11, Tanveer Ahmed, is not expected to help them win, it’s this. An edged boundary from him gets them close; they need 11 from 8, then ten from the last over. Nadeem Ahmed will face it; van Meekeren will bowl it.Nadeem mishits the first ball. No run is taken. “Just gotta get one of those away,” says Cook. Then a wide from a short ball. Another mishit, another run refused. Then another knocked-back single, which drives Cook mad. Then another wide. Then a taken single. “Why take it now?” says Cook. Another single. At no stage has either batsman tried to use the pace of van Meekeren against him. They knew he was going to bowl short. He did bowl short, and they did nothing with it.The batsmen almost exchange bats after a chat. Pickett laughs, Cook just shakes his head in disbelief. They need a six off the last ball to tie. It is mistimed to long-off. They don’t even take the single. Someone mentions net run rate, but it’s not the most important thing on people’s minds.Cook takes a big breath and gets up. After the handshakes he takes his team out to the middle. He speaks softly, like a disappointed teacher. He wants them to know that they played outstandingly well, but from 250 for 2, they threw it away. He tells them they were neither calm nor smart, and references another game where the same thing happened. He praises their talent but questions their decision-making. “We want to make a name for ourselves and we had a chance to do that today.” He tails off at the end.I go back to my seat to pack up. Cook comes over and asks me what I think about the game. At first I am flattered. I think I have penetrated the inner circle. I am an analyst. But then I realise that in truth, he’s just out of answers.I tell him that maybe he could have micromanaged more when the collapse started, sent out more notes, been more vocal. But even as I say it, I hedge, because I am not even sure that any of that would have worked. Cook shrugs and goes silent.Netherlands will make over 300 again in the next game. Ehsan will over-compensate for his swing again. Hong Kong try will try to execute the correct plan for opener Stephan Myburgh, but the bowlers won’t follow through on it. On his whiteboard Cook will write, “When you get in, go on and win the game”. Rath and Hayat will again make a big partnership but neither will bat through to the end. Nizakat will again thrill, and then get out well before his job is done. And Hong Kong will again struggle with their middle order, and their tail will again not be good enough to complete the win.The game will remind me of something that Cook said after the first loss. “We can say we are learning, but not if we keep making the same mistakes.”Hong Kong, the team with only three proper cricket grounds, have scored over 600 chasing over two games, but without that win, it feels like it’s all for nothing.In the second game, I notice one different thing from Cook. Hong Kong had managed to keep the Netherlands top order under pressure much better. Since they were batting too slow, you could sense they were going to attack when van der Merwe came in. Cook realised it after one attacking shot.There are no quiet pauses this time. He is up and tells his 12th man to pass on the message: “They are going to come at us hard, but if you can hang in there, two quick wickets might come and that will knock the stuffing out of them.”But just telling his 12th man isn’t enough, so he runs over to a sweeper on the boundary and tells him too. Then he runs off and tells another sweeper the same message. If Cook could, he’d tell them all.Netherlands do come hard, a chance is created, and it is dropped. The next over, a wicket is taken. Cook just shrugs his shoulders and goes quiet again.

'He did a hell of a lot for the game'

Jagmohan Dalmiya held the game’s finances and its overall health in excellent balance. History should judge him very kindly

Ian Chappell21-Sep-20156:16

Chappell: Jaggu was a rarity amongst administrators

I’ll never forget the first time I met Jaggu. We were in Calcutta in the lead-up to the 1996 World Cup. I was there as an ex-captain, we did a thing inside Salt Lake Stadium and he said we’ve got a motorcade going back. I asked him if it’ll be worth doing it and he said ‘Ian, it’ll be one of the great experiences of your life.’ I went on that motorcade and I had never seen so many people in my life. And so many happy people, throwing flower petals, waving, smiling.I remember I was standing next to Mark Burgess, the ex-New Zealand captain, and I remember asking him, ‘Burgee, how many people do you think we’ve passed?’ and he said ‘I don’t know, but it’s more than the population of New Zealand.’ At that stage I think that was about three-and-a-half million. So Jaggu was absolutely spot on, it was a memorable experience. So memorable I went back to the hotel and rang my wife to tell her about it that evening. That sort of set me off with Jaggu.He copped a lot of criticism in Australia from the administrators and I think it was because he outsmarted them over the 1996 World Cup and got it to the sub-continent. I remember I’d heard a few of these accusations and I had put them to Jaggu. He listened to them all and he answered them all very genuinely. I went back and I told one of the Australian administrators what his answers were. And he said, ask him about offering money to different countries to get the hosting. So I asked Jaggu that the next night. He smiled and said ‘Ah, the Australians would know about giving money to other countries, that’s how they got the 1992 World Cup.’ And then there was a pause, a very effective pause, and he said ‘I just offered them more.’I thought to myself then, here’s a very smart man. A man that I wouldn’t like to have as an enemy.To me Jaggu was a rarity amongst administrators because he genuinely wanted to listen to the opinions of former players. I felt he also wanted to have former players involved in the real, hard, decision-making process of administration.I think he was an Indian administrator who stood firm at a time when the English and Australian administrators were used to getting their own way. And I think that’s why he copped a lot of criticism from those two areas because he wasn’t one who just bowed down and rolled over.He was responsible for setting the ICC finances on a firm footing. He organised the Knockout Trophy tournament in Bangladesh in 1998. I think $6 million came in from that. He helped enormously with funding for the development of the game.We had a big meeting once in Kolkata, a whole lot of ex-players and we talked about having a World Test Championship, and some very good ideas came forward. I think if Jaggu had stayed on a bit longer as ICC president, I’m sure today there would be a World Test Championship.Having seen him perform as an administrator and been aware of how much he cared for the game, I think he’d be a little bit sad about the fact that the bottom line these days seems to be the be-all-and-end-all of cricket administration. Jaggu was very very good at getting the finances and the money in, but he also had that balance. To look after the health of the finances as well as look after the game and make sure the game is healthy as well. He had that balance pretty right. I’m not convinced they have it right, right now.I think history should judge Jaggu very kindly. I think he did a hell of a lot for the game. Not just the financial side, he cared about the game. He had some very good ideas. He was also very keen on having ex-players, who were mentors, getting (them as) a group together to promote cricket in many different parts of the world. And once Jaggu moved on from the presidency, those ideas just seemed to disappear. I hope that he’s remembered for a lot of that work.

Bangladesh's disgraced boy hero

Mohammad Ashraful was thrust into the harsh glare of international cricket at a young age and given a long rope. There were several thrilling innings, but his career was dogged by inconsistency and ended in corruption

Mohammad Isam18-Jun-2014In Matara in 2013, some Bangladesh players had gathered on the viewing balcony as Mohammad Ashraful neared a century. As he played loose shots against an offspinner, a team-mate cried out, asking Ashraful to be cautious.”.”Mahmudullah’s warning was curious, and not meant to be heard by those in the gallery below. He wanted Ashraful to be careful, get to a century that would confirm his place in the Galle Test, and complete a comeback after a two-year absence.The words rang true, especially after the events that unfolded two months later, when Ashraful told the ACSU’s investigation officers that he had been involved in match-fixing in the 2013 BPL. A year later, after the investigation had run its course, Ashraful’s was banned for eight years, bringing to an end a career full of unfulfilled potential.Mahmudullah’s warning had sounded stern at the time, but he is not the sort to act haughty with a senior team-mate for the sake of it. He had also addressed Ashraful as , the Bangla word for ‘master.’ They were probably the words that described most accurately what everyone felt about Ashraful, and what they wanted him to do.Mahmudullah wasn’t telling just any batsman to be careful that day in Matara. He was telling a cricketer who had played for more than two-thirds of the time since Bangladesh began their Test journey. He was telling the man who, for seven years from 2001, was the sole hope of a ship that had wobbled the moment it left the dock.Most Bangladesh fans had not seen Ashraful become the youngest centurion in the world, but for the next eight years, the country held its breath when he batted. His mistakes were scrutinised by a growing group of critics, but when he hooked and pulled top fast bowlers, the natural response was to be awestruck. There was beauty to his off-side play too; his three types of cuts – each with its own bat speed and angle – the straight drive, the softly placed and the blasted cover drive. There were also scoops and dinks.Ashraful was the first Bangladesh batsman their opponents planned for. He made batting look easy, as those around him struggled. He meant so much to Bangladesh because he was the beacon of hope in the only sport they were good at.He did not give a damn either. Ashraful would throw away a superb start and the media would moan for a few days, but the public would remember how he had attacked the fast bowler. The boy who bullied bullies was adored. Ashraful could take on the world, but he did only occasionally.The first of those occasions was in 2004, by when Bangladesh’s Test status had been questioned many times and they needed a substantial performance. Ashraful made 158 against India, an innings many have said kept Bangladesh afloat in international cricket In June 2005, Ashraful dismantled Ricky Ponting’s Australia – one of the greatest teams across sport – with a century in an ODI. It still is perhaps the biggest upset in cricket.Mahmudullah’s warning, however, also had its root in Ashraful’s indiscretions: the wafts that offered catches, the ill-timed blasts, the glides he could not get past the keeper or the cordon, the cute nudges that looked ugly once they failed him, and the starts he wasted so frequently.Ashraful failed as Bangladesh captain, and failed as a batsman during that time too. A while later he lost the leadership and the dressing room. It took only one cute shot in a Twenty20 game against Ireland in 2009 to erode much of the remaining belief in Ashraful. The extra rope he had always been given began to run out, and soon he was an outsider.Ashraful did not contribute much to the Test wins he played in. He was a better ODI batsman, and all three of his hundreds in the format led to Bangladesh victories. Ashraful was the master who needed to be attentive, but he chose the other path. To explain the complexity that surrounds him, one has to look into his ample talent and how he frittered it away a chunk at a time.Then, like in US congressional hearings, several key figures in Bangladesh cricket would have to explain their influence on Ashraful, a flawed cricketer and now blemished man. The list includes captains and coaches, a former board president, BCB directors, family members, friends and a mentor.Ashraful would not be spared this imaginary hearing either. He must explain how this has come to pass – a fitful international career that was ended by corruption when it could have been ended prematurely by flawed strokeplay.Bangladesh’s most gifted sportsman has now been thrown out of the ring. He is deemed not honest enough to play the game for at least five years. Despite their on-field hardships since 1986, this has to be the lowest point in Bangladesh cricket. There is so much shame in cheating.Despite how terribly it ended, Ashraful’s career began in the same way that many subcontinent cricket stories did in the 1990s. A scrawny boy walks several miles from his house for cricket practice. One day his timing and the time he has to hit the ball catches the coach’s eye, and he rapidly rises in a system that badly needs a star. He is thrust on to the biggest stage too soon, but a fairytale start masks the fundamental chinks in the make-up of the young man. And because of his talent, and the lack of it around him, he has to behave beyond his years.Bangladesh also needed a poster boy at the time, and Ashraful was given a lot of rope. He often tested patience but repaid faith when his team was struggling. His most famous scoring sequence was the two days in the UK, where he sank Australia and toyed with England for 64 minutes the next day.Ashraful might not have heard Mahmudullah, but he batted dutifully, made it to the Test team to score 190 in Galle, his career-best score. Later that afternoon in Matara, Ashraful said how taking a boat into the Indian Ocean had become a matter of pride for him, after he saw how comfortable Sohag Gazi and Rubel Hossain were in rough water.”It just looked odd that I was standing in the beach,” he said, followed by a loud giggle. Ashraful laughs wholeheartedly and he sometimes laughs at his own joke. Like he did fleetingly when he told the media of his involvement in match-fixing.Ashraful’s eyes were watery that day in Matara, an allergic condition that often bothered him during his playing career. His eyes were watery, and red, in the darkened garage of his home in Banasree too.It was hard to read Ashraful as he contemplated a comeback in Sri Lanka. It was hard to read Ashraful as he laughed in that hot garage and confessed his wrongdoing. When a reporter asked him to speak off the record, he said, “Speaking off camera got me into trouble in the first place,” and laughed loudly again. The sentence hung in the air as he took the elevator to his apartment, surrounded by three friends.

Raina and the art of finishing

Suresh Raina has been one of India’s finest finishers in limited overs cricket for a few years, but he doesn’t get his due

Abhishek Purohit at the Premadasa30-Jul-2012Say what you will about his abilities as a Test batsman, but Suresh Raina showed once again on Saturday why he is one of the finest finishers in limited-overs cricket. He walked in to face Lasith Malinga’s hat-trick ball with India needing more than a 100 runs at an asking-rate approaching seven-and-a-half. He saw it gallop to above nine an over after the fall of the centurion Gautam Gambhir before taking India home in the last over along with Irfan Pathan.The big guns at the top of the India batting order get the hundreds and set up the game but it is Raina who walks into a no-win situation at No. 5 or No. 6. If he gets quick runs, it is said to be because of the platform provided by the preceding batsmen; if he doesn’t, he is blamed for failing to utilise it.What helps Raina is that he backs his style of play, whatever the state of the game. He’ll walk in busily, take a few brisk singles to size up the situation, and before you know it, he would have moved into the 20s with a four or two. More often than not, the boundary will be a nudge down the leg side or a guide past point unless he gets a really loose ball. All the time, he’ll look to push hard for the second or the third run, putting the fielders under pressure. When he is certain that the time has arrived, he will pull out his signature strokes – the bent-knee loft over extra cover and the heave over midwicket.There was a time against West Indies last year when he was going for big strokes too early in his innings and perishing. But now, he is back to his usual style of building an innings and has three fifties in his last five outings.Every now and then, Raina has been rescuing Indian chases when early wickets have fallen or when the asking-rate has risen too high. In only his eighth ODI innings, Raina hit an unbeaten 81 as India recovered from 92 for 5 to chase 227 against England in 2006. He even has a hundred at No. 6, when he took India to 245 from 60 for 5 in a tri-series final against Sri Lanka in 2010. Probably the most memorable instance is when he hit a quick unbeaten 34 to help Yuvraj Singh lift India into the 2011 World Cup semi-final. India were 187 for 5 chasing Australia’s 260 when Raina came in for only his second game of the tournament, with Yusuf Pathan having been preferred over him earlier.The situation was more dire on Saturday, in that Raina was the only specialist batsmen remaining. India had lost MS Dhoni and Rohit Sharma to the first two balls of the batting Powerplay; they lost Gambhir three overs later. Raina had only Irfan for company with R Ashwin to follow. Both men are not bad with the bat, but you wouldn’t bet on them single-handedly turning a game around with it. Raina was on seven when Irfan walked in. He would end on 65, Irfan on 34 – a creditable supporting act – with the partnership worth 92 off 67.Yes, there were some edges that brought fours, Sri Lanka missed a couple of run-out chances, Raina was even dropped on 19, by substitute fielder Sachithra Senanayake, but there was also lots of sensible running by the duo, and nerveless boundary hitting by Raina when needed.To Irfan’s credit, he gave the strike regularly to Raina without trying much daredevilry himself but it was the latter who had to rein in the asking-rate, which had risen to 9.37 at the start of the 44th over. It was in this over, bowled by Isuru Udana, that the game started to turn around. Raina managed a couple of fours, heaving past short fine leg and outside-edging past short third man.Then came the big moment. Malinga returned in the 45th to bowl the first of his remaining three overs. Fifty-two needed off six overs, including three from Malinga – a lot of IPL sides will tell you that it is much harder than an asking-rate of 8.66.

If you give him an opportunity the way we did, he will finish the game off so credit to himMahela Jayawardene

Against Raina, even Malinga does not favour the yorker. Three of the four deliveries he bowled to Raina in that over were short balls. Raina expectedly could not do much with them, but he made sure he guided the fourth, a yorker outside off, past the wicketkeeper for four. With two men waiting at backward point for a squarer stroke. Irfan did the same off the last ball of the over, and Raina finished the game after that.Angelo Mathews was lofted over extra cover for four and Malinga was heaved in trademark Raina fashion over long-on for six, the ball remaining in the air long enough and travelling far enough to firmly signal that the turnaround was complete.As a reminder of how close the margin is in such tight finishes, there was another inside-edged four, off Mathews, and a throw, again by Mathews, that would have run out Raina by quite some distance, had it hit.Mahela Jayawardene rued the missed opportunities but gave credit to Raina and Irfan. “Raina batted really well and [there was] good support from Irfan as well,” Jayawardene said. “You needed another guy to go along with that. He is a quality player. If you give him an opportunity the way we did, he will finish the game off so credit to him.”Jayawardene said he could have tried bowling a spinner at the death in hindsight but wasn’t sure about it with some dew around. “I felt that the spinners may not get any grip, the fast bowlers were struggling a bit as well so that’s something I probably think [in] hindsight [but] at that particular moment I felt the quicks were bowling well. Still we had an opportunity [but] we dropped a catch and [missed] a couple of those run outs. Few edges [went for runs], that’s how the game goes. Any other day things would have turned around in our favour but today they played some good cricket aswell. Those two [Raina and Irfan] batted really well, they put on 92 runs in that situation. They deserved to win.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus